| Title |
A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rochelle M Eime, Janet A Young, Jack T Harvey, Melanie J Charity, Warren R Payne |
| Abstract |
The definition of health incorporates the physical, social and mental domains, however the Physical Activity (PA) guidelines do not address social health. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence about the levels or types of PA associated specifically with psychological health. This paper first presents the results of a systematic review of the psychological and social health benefits of participation in sport by adults. Secondly, the information arising from the systematic review has been used to develop a conceptual model of Health through Sport. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
| Scientists | 13 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,034 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1025 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 161 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 149 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 11% |
| Researcher | 55 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 5% |
| Other | 184 | 18% |
| Unknown | 320 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 214 | 21% |
| Psychology | 127 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 6% |
| Other | 140 | 14% |
| Unknown | 359 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,464,112
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#506
of 2,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,680
of 321,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.