↓ Skip to main content

Long-term effects of enteral feeding on growth and mental health in adolescents with anorexia nervosa—results of a retrospective German cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Long-term effects of enteral feeding on growth and mental health in adolescents with anorexia nervosa—results of a retrospective German cohort study
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2013.244
Pubmed ID
Authors

I Nehring, K Kewitz, R von Kries, U Thyen

Abstract

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe eating disorder with a high mortality rate. Treatment regimes show regional and global variation and are sometimes supported by enteral feeding (EF) via nasogastric tube, although risks and benefits are still unclear. We aimed to find out whether EF improves growth and AN recovery and prevents psychiatric comorbidities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Psychology 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,211,690
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,636
of 3,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,247
of 306,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#56
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.