↓ Skip to main content

A commentary on Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
A commentary on Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrg3457-c1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo de los Campos, Daniel A. Sorensen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Brazil 2 3%
Austria 1 2%
France 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 53 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 15 24%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Mathematics 4 6%
Computer Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,018,708
of 10,232,583 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#1,504
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,185
of 187,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#33
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,232,583 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.