↓ Skip to main content

Water-mediated structuring of bone apatite

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Water-mediated structuring of bone apatite
Published in
Nature Materials, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nmat3787
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Wang, Stanislas Von Euw, Francisco M. Fernandes, Sophie Cassaignon, Mohamed Selmane, Guillaume Laurent, Gérard Pehau-Arnaudet, Cristina Coelho, Laure Bonhomme-Coury, Marie-Madeleine Giraud-Guille, Florence Babonneau, Thierry Azaïs, Nadine Nassif

Abstract

It is well known that organic molecules from the vertebrate extracellular matrix of calcifying tissues are essential in structuring the apatite mineral. Here, we show that water also plays a structuring role. By using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, wide-angle X-ray scattering and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy to characterize the structure and organization of crystalline and biomimetic apatite nanoparticles as well as intact bone samples, we demonstrate that water orients apatite crystals through an amorphous calcium phosphate-like layer that coats the crystalline core of bone apatite. This disordered layer is reminiscent of those found around the crystalline core of calcified biominerals in various natural composite materials in vivo. This work provides an extended local model of bone biomineralization.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 118 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 33%
Researcher 34 26%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 39 30%
Materials Science 24 18%
Engineering 16 12%
Unspecified 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Other 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,040,607
of 12,199,539 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#969
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,159
of 169,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#30
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,199,539 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.