↓ Skip to main content

The International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE): design and methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
Title
The International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE): design and methods
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-900
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter T Katzmarzyk, Tiago V Barreira, Stephanie T Broyles, Catherine M Champagne, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Mikael Fogelholm, Gang Hu, William D Johnson, Rebecca Kuriyan, Anura Kurpad, Estelle V Lambert, Carol Maher, José Maia, Victor Matsudo, Tim Olds, Vincent Onywera, Olga L Sarmiento, Martyn Standage, Mark S Tremblay, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Pei Zhao, Timothy S Church

Abstract

The primary aim of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE) was to determine the relationships between lifestyle behaviours and obesity in a multi-national study of children, and to investigate the influence of higher-order characteristics such as behavioural settings, and the physical, social and policy environments, on the observed relationships within and between countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 440 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 23%
Researcher 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 80 18%
Unknown 80 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 21%
Sports and Recreations 69 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 13%
Social Sciences 36 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 5%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 98 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#296,867
of 24,518,979 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#259
of 16,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,275
of 211,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#11
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,518,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.