| Title |
Quantifying the welfare impact of air asphyxia in rainbow trout slaughter for policy and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2025
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-025-04272-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia Schuck-Paim, Wladimir J. Alonso, Patricia Alves Pereira, João L. Saraiva, Marco Cerqueira, Chiawen Chiang, Lynne U. Sneddon |
Login to access the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 10% |
| Spain | 10 | 9% |
| Colombia | 5 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Monaco | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 101 | 94% |
| Scientists | 5 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 481. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2025.
All research outputs
#64,478
of 29,561,801 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#917
of 164,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#833
of 332,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#14
of 4,041 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,561,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,041 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.