↓ Skip to main content

Opposite interaction matters

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Opposite interaction matters
Published in
Nature Materials, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/nmat4873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Teichert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 28%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 22%
Materials Science 4 22%
Chemistry 4 22%
Engineering 4 22%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,828,031
of 17,822,916 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#2,336
of 3,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,712
of 268,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#57
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,822,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.