↓ Skip to main content

Integrating personalized gene expression profiles into predictive disease-associated gene pools

Overview of attention for article published in npj Systems Biology and Applications, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Integrating personalized gene expression profiles into predictive disease-associated gene pools
Published in
npj Systems Biology and Applications, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41540-017-0009-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg Menche, Emre Guney, Amitabh Sharma, Patrick J. Branigan, Matthew J. Loza, Frédéric Baribaud, Radu Dobrin, Albert-László Barabási

Abstract

Gene expression data are routinely used to identify genes that on average exhibit different expression levels between a case and a control group. Yet, very few of such differentially expressed genes are detectably perturbed in individual patients. Here, we develop a framework to construct personalized perturbation profiles for individual subjects, identifying the set of genes that are significantly perturbed in each individual. This allows us to characterize the heterogeneity of the molecular manifestations of complex diseases by quantifying the expression-level similarities and differences among patients with the same phenotype. We show that despite the high heterogeneity of the individual perturbation profiles, patients with asthma, Parkinson and Huntington's disease share a broadpool of sporadically disease-associated genes, and that individuals with statistically significant overlap with this pool have a 80-100% chance of being diagnosed with the disease. The developed framework opens up the possibility to apply gene expression data in the context of precision medicine, with important implications for biomarker identification, drug development, diagnosis and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 23%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 17%
Computer Science 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,303,474
of 24,280,456 outputs
Outputs from npj Systems Biology and Applications
#26
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,661
of 312,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Systems Biology and Applications
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,280,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.