↓ Skip to main content

TDtest: easy detection of bacterial tolerance and persistence in clinical isolates by a modified disk-diffusion assay

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
TDtest: easy detection of bacterial tolerance and persistence in clinical isolates by a modified disk-diffusion assay
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep41284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orit Gefen, Betty Chekol, Jacob Strahilevitz, Nathalie Q. Balaban

Abstract

Antibiotic tolerance - the ability for prolonged survival under bactericidal treatments - is a potentially clinically significant phenomenon that is commonly overlooked in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Recent in vitro experiments show that high tolerance can evolve under intermittent antibiotic treatments in as little as eight exposures to high doses of antibiotics, suggesting that tolerance may evolve also in patients. However, tests for antibiotic susceptibilities, such as the disk-diffusion assay, evaluate only the concentration at which a bacterial strain stops growing, namely resistance level. High tolerance strains will not be detected using these tests. We present a simple modification of the standard disk-diffusion assay that allows the semi-quantitative evaluation of tolerance levels. This novel method, the "TDtest", enabled the detection of tolerant and persistent bacteria by promoting the growth of the surviving bacteria in the inhibition zone, once the antibiotic has diffused away. Using the TDtest, we were able to detect different levels of antibiotic tolerance in clinical isolates of E. coli. The TDtest also identified antibiotics that effectively eliminate tolerant bacteria. The additional information on drug susceptibility provided by the TDtest should enable tailoring better treatment regimens for pathogenic bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Researcher 29 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 74 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 11%
Chemistry 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 85 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,012,526
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#47,375
of 123,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,249
of 420,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,563
of 3,916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.