↓ Skip to main content

Signatures of personality on dense 3D facial images

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Signatures of personality on dense 3D facial images
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-00071-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sile Hu, Jieyi Xiong, Pengcheng Fu, Lu Qiao, Jingze Tan, Li Jin, Kun Tang

Abstract

It has long been speculated that cues on the human face exist that allow observers to make reliable judgments of others' personality traits. However, direct evidence of association between facial shapes and personality is missing from the current literature. This study assessed the personality attributes of 834 Han Chinese volunteers (405 males and 429 females), utilising the five-factor personality model ('Big Five'), and collected their neutral 3D facial images. Dense anatomical correspondence was established across the 3D facial images in order to allow high-dimensional quantitative analyses of the facial phenotypes. In this paper, we developed a Partial Least Squares (PLS) -based method. We used composite partial least squares component (CPSLC) to test association between the self-tested personality scores and the dense 3D facial image data, then used principal component analysis (PCA) for further validation. Among the five personality factors, agreeableness and conscientiousness in males and extraversion in females were significantly associated with specific facial patterns. The personality-related facial patterns were extracted and their effects were extrapolated on simulated 3D facial models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Ecuador 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 17%
Computer Science 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 23 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,079,839
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#26,156
of 143,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,624
of 327,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#924
of 4,590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.