| Title |
Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature21391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel P. LePage, Jason A. Metcalf, Sarah R. Bordenstein, Jungmin On, Jessamyn I. Perlmutter, J. Dylan Shropshire, Emily M. Layton, Lisa J. Funkhouser-Jones, John F. Beckmann, Seth R. Bordenstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 72 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 7% |
| Australia | 10 | 4% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Austria | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 89 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 118 | 49% |
| Scientists | 112 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 418 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 21% |
| Researcher | 76 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 15% |
| Unknown | 78 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 110 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Unknown | 85 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#102,052
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,016
of 98,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,462
of 326,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#166
of 907 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 907 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.