↓ Skip to main content

Using Site Assessment and Risk Analysis to Plan and Build Disaster-Resistant Programs and Facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Lab Animal, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Using Site Assessment and Risk Analysis to Plan and Build Disaster-Resistant Programs and Facilities
Published in
Lab Animal, February 2003
DOI 10.1038/laban0203-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Vogelweid, James B. Hill, Robert A. Shea, Sam J. Truby, Laurel D. Schantz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Psychology 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Lab Animal
#242
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,027
of 127,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab Animal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them