The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Mapping global land conversion pressure to support conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Data, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41597-024-03639-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Oakleaf, Christina Kennedy, Nicholas H. Wolff, Drew E. Terasaki Hart, Peter Ellis, David M. Theobald, Brandie Fariss, Karl Burkart, Joseph Kiesecker |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,095,071
of 26,394,137 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#1,679
of 3,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,060
of 136,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#26
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,394,137 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.