| Title |
Designing a complex intervention for dementia case management in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Waugh, Allana Austin, Jill Manthorpe, Chris Fox, Barbara Stephens, Louise Robinson, Steve Iliffe |
| Abstract |
Community-based support will become increasingly important for people with dementia, but currently services are fragmented and the quality of care is variable. Case management is a popular approach to care co-ordination, but evidence to date on its effectiveness in dementia has been equivocal. Case management interventions need to be designed to overcome obstacles to care co-ordination and maximise benefit. A successful case management methodology was adapted from the United States (US) version for use in English primary care, with a view to a definitive trial. Medical Research Council guidance on the development of complex interventions was implemented in the adaptation process, to capture the skill sets, person characteristics and learning needs of primary care based case managers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 19% |
| Psychology | 27 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,547,401
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,141
of 2,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,079
of 191,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.