↓ Skip to main content

A synthetic AAV vector enables safe and efficient gene transfer to the mammalian inner ear

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 8,594)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
105 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
95 X users
patent
38 patents
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
Title
A synthetic AAV vector enables safe and efficient gene transfer to the mammalian inner ear
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/nbt.3781
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas D Landegger, Bifeng Pan, Charles Askew, Sarah J Wassmer, Sarah D Gluck, Alice Galvin, Ruth Taylor, Andrew Forge, Konstantina M Stankovic, Jeffrey R Holt, Luk H Vandenberghe

Abstract

Efforts to develop gene therapies for hearing loss have been hampered by the lack of safe, efficient, and clinically relevant delivery modalities. Here we demonstrate the safety and efficiency of Anc80L65, a rationally designed synthetic vector, for transgene delivery to the mouse cochlea. Ex vivo transduction of mouse organotypic explants identified Anc80L65 from a set of other adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors as a potent vector for the cochlear cell targets. Round window membrane injection resulted in highly efficient transduction of inner and outer hair cells in mice, a substantial improvement over conventional AAV vectors. Anc80L65 round window injection was well tolerated, as indicated by sensory cell function, hearing and vestibular function, and immunologic parameters. The ability of Anc80L65 to target outer hair cells at high rates, a requirement for restoration of complex auditory function, may enable future gene therapies for hearing and balance disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 321 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 22%
Researcher 63 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Student > Master 22 7%
Other 19 6%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 61 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 12%
Neuroscience 37 12%
Unspecified 16 5%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 65 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 916. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#18,896
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#36
of 8,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360
of 426,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#2
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.