| Title |
Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms3126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Domcke, Rileen Sinha, Douglas A. Levine, Chris Sander, Nikolaus Schultz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1227 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 295 | 23% |
| Researcher | 271 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 141 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 106 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 4% |
| Other | 185 | 15% |
| Unknown | 220 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 339 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 312 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 14% |
| Engineering | 37 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 36 | 3% |
| Other | 130 | 10% |
| Unknown | 247 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,330,025
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#20,165
of 58,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,895
of 207,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#102
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.