| Title |
Observation of hypervalent CLi6 by Knudsen-effusion mass spectrometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1038/355432a0 |
| Authors |
Hiroshi Kudo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,578,560
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#50,944
of 90,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,801
of 61,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#50
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.