↓ Skip to main content

Xist-dependent imprinted X inactivation and the early developmental consequences of its failure

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Xist-dependent imprinted X inactivation and the early developmental consequences of its failure
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.3365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maud Borensztein, Laurène Syx, Katia Ancelin, Patricia Diabangouaya, Christel Picard, Tao Liu, Jun-Bin Liang, Ivaylo Vassilev, Rafael Galupa, Nicolas Servant, Emmanuel Barillot, Azim Surani, Chong-Jian Chen, Edith Heard

Abstract

The long noncoding RNA Xist is expressed from only the paternal X chromosome in mouse preimplantation female embryos and mediates transcriptional silencing of that chromosome. In females, absence of Xist leads to postimplantation lethality. Here, through single-cell RNA sequencing of early preimplantation mouse embryos, we found that the initiation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation absolutely requires Xist. Lack of paternal Xist leads to genome-wide transcriptional misregulation in the early blastocyst and to failure to activate the extraembryonic pathway that is essential for postimplantation development. We also demonstrate that the expression dynamics of X-linked genes depends on the strain and parent of origin as well as on the location along the X chromosome, particularly at the first 'entry' sites of Xist. This study demonstrates that dosage-compensation failure has an effect as early as the blastocyst stage and reveals genetic and epigenetic contributions to orchestrating transcriptional silencing of the X chromosome during early embryogenesis.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 21%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Master 31 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 98 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,113,193
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#773
of 3,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,141
of 420,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#19
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.