| Title |
Compartments in medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity are connected through differentiation along the granular precursor lineage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-44117-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David R. Ghasemi, Konstantin Okonechnikov, Anne Rademacher, Stephan Tirier, Kendra K. Maass, Hanna Schumacher, Piyush Joshi, Maxwell P. Gold, Julia Sundheimer, Britta Statz, Ahmet S. Rifaioglu, Katharina Bauer, Sabrina Schumacher, Michele Bortolomeazzi, Felice Giangaspero, Kati J. Ernst, Steven C. Clifford, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, David T. W. Jones, Daisuke Kawauchi, Ernest Fraenkel, Jan-Philipp Mallm, Karsten Rippe, Andrey Korshunov, Stefan M. Pfister, Kristian W. Pajtler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 14 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
| Scientists | 16 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#573,414
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#9,845
of 58,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,863
of 353,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#282
of 2,338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.