↓ Skip to main content

Chiral quantum optics

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
Title
Chiral quantum optics
Published in
Nature, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature21037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Lodahl, Sahand Mahmoodian, Søren Stobbe, Arno Rauschenbeutel, Philipp Schneeweiss, Jürgen Volz, Hannes Pichler, Peter Zoller

Abstract

Advanced photonic nanostructures are currently revolutionizing the optics and photonics that underpin applications ranging from light technology to quantum-information processing. The strong light confinement in these structures can lock the local polarization of the light to its propagation direction, leading to propagation-direction-dependent emission, scattering and absorption of photons by quantum emitters. The possibility of such a propagation-direction-dependent, or chiral, light-matter interaction is not accounted for in standard quantum optics and its recent discovery brought about the research field of chiral quantum optics. The latter offers fundamentally new functionalities and applications: it enables the assembly of non-reciprocal single-photon devices that can be operated in a quantum superposition of two or more of their operational states and the realization of deterministic spin-photon interfaces. Moreover, engineered directional photonic reservoirs could lead to the development of complex quantum networks that, for example, could simulate novel classes of quantum many-body systems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 385 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 37%
Researcher 78 19%
Student > Master 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Professor 25 6%
Other 75 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 283 70%
Engineering 50 12%
Unspecified 33 8%
Materials Science 14 3%
Chemistry 10 2%
Other 12 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#56,810
of 12,262,458 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,125
of 62,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,340
of 332,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#262
of 804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,262,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.