↓ Skip to main content

Randomized comparison of early and late vaccination with inactivated poliovirus vaccine after allogeneic BMT

Overview of attention for article published in Bone Marrow Transplantation, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Randomized comparison of early and late vaccination with inactivated poliovirus vaccine after allogeneic BMT
Published in
Bone Marrow Transplantation, October 1997
DOI 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700959
Pubmed ID
Authors

T Parkkali, M Stenvik, T Ruutu, T Hovi, L Volin, P Ruutu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 24%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#1,667
of 3,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,401
of 30,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.