| Title |
Refined Ordovician timescale reveals no link between asteroid breakup and biodiversification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms14066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Lindskog, M. M. Costa, C.M.Ø. Rasmussen, J. N. Connelly, M. E. Eriksson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Japan | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 80% |
| Scientists | 10 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 63% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#179,101
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,538
of 57,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,951
of 423,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#65
of 921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.