↓ Skip to main content

Anisotropic leaky-mode modulator for holographic video displays

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
18 tweeters
patent
19 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Anisotropic leaky-mode modulator for holographic video displays
Published in
Nature, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12217
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. E. Smalley, Q. Y. J. Smithwick, V. M. Bove, J. Barabas, S. Jolly

Abstract

Every holographic video display is built on a spatial light modulator, which directs light by diffraction to form points in three-dimensional space. The modulators currently used for holographic video displays are challenging to use for several reasons: they have relatively low bandwidth, high cost, low diffraction angle, poor scalability, and the presence of quantization noise, unwanted diffractive orders and zero-order light. Here we present modulators for holographic video displays based on anisotropic leaky-mode couplers, which have the potential to address all of these challenges. These modulators can be fabricated simply, monolithically and at low cost. Additionally, these modulators are capable of new functionalities, such as wavelength division multiplexing for colour display. We demonstrate three enabling properties of particular interest-polarization rotation, enlarged angular diffraction, and frequency domain colour filtering-and suggest that this technology can be used as a platform for low-cost, high-performance holographic video displays.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 38%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 65 41%
Physics and Astronomy 44 28%
Materials Science 10 6%
Computer Science 6 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 17 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#298,131
of 19,722,829 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#17,035
of 84,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,348
of 170,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#275
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,722,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.