↓ Skip to main content

Myths and mad March hares

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Myths and mad March hares
Published in
Nature, February 1987
DOI 10.1038/325737a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

JOHN E. C. FLUX

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,510,637
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,558
of 91,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,567
of 44,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#87
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.