Title |
Recent extinctions disturb path to equilibrium diversity in Caribbean bats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41559-016-0026 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luis Valente, Rampal S. Etienne, Liliana M. Dávalos |
Abstract |
Islands are ideal systems to model temporal changes in biodiversity and reveal the influence of humans on natural communities. Although theory predicts biodiversity on islands tends towards an equilibrium value, the recent extinction of large proportions of island biotas complicates testing this model. The well-preserved subfossil record of Caribbean bats-involving multiple insular radiations-provides a rare opportunity to model diversity dynamics in an insular community. Here, we reconstruct the diversity trajectory in noctilionoid bats of the Greater Antilles by applying a dynamic model of colonization, extinction and speciation to phylogenetic and palaeontological data including all known extinct and extant species. We show species richness asymptotes to an equilibrium value, a demonstration of natural equilibrium dynamics across an entire community. However, recent extinctions-many caused by humans-have wiped out nearly a third of island lineages, dragging diversity away from equilibrium. Using a metric to measure island biodiversity loss, we estimate it will take at least eight million years to regain pre-human diversity levels. Our integrative approach reveals how anthropogenic extinctions can drastically alter the natural trajectory of biological communities, resulting in evolutionary disequilibrium. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Peru | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 55% |
Scientists | 23 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
Researcher | 13 | 14% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 56% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |