| Title |
Efficient electrospray deposition of surfaces smaller than the spray plume
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-40638-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah H. Park, Lin Lei, Darrel D’Souza, Robert Zipkin, Emily T. DiMartini, Maria Atzampou, Emran O. Lallow, Jerry W. Shan, Jeffrey D. Zahn, David I. Shreiber, Hao Lin, Joel N. Maslow, Jonathan P. Singer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 43% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#168,898
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,403
of 58,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,277
of 359,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#80
of 2,144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.