| Title |
Why not connectomics?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.2480 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua L Morgan, Jeff W Lichtman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 4% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 399 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 121 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 107 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 8% |
| Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 84 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 7% |
| Engineering | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,182,578
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,512
of 5,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,369
of 208,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#22
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.