Kershaw asks how we demonstrate the societal impact of our research. Start by expanding our metrics! https://t.co/tfNb7UvZ4a #transformres17
RT @jbrittholbrook: Research impact: We need negative metrics too https://t.co/uR8MvaVzlg Conducting an experiment.
Research impact: We need negative metrics too https://t.co/uR8MvaVzlg Conducting an experiment.
@lakens @rmounce @Sci_Hub "we need 'negative' metrics too", "rabble rousing, angry letters from important people" https://t.co/BHQnmM3WuE
How many metrics do we need? Holbrook found 56 (some -ve) https://t.co/FWzRqq2zjY #gamingmetrics
RT @anne_bergen: 56 indicators of research impact - http://t.co/rLNMiE3R7J and a call for negative metrics http://t.co/dUX8FYZeUr via @Mobi…
RT @anne_bergen: 56 indicators of research impact - http://t.co/rLNMiE3R7J and a call for negative metrics http://t.co/dUX8FYZeUr via @Mobi…
56 indicators of research impact - http://t.co/rLNMiE3R7J and a call for negative metrics http://t.co/dUX8FYZeUr via @MobilizeShawna
Research impact: We need negative metrics too: http://t.co/OPXsR9Mthl
When @kelli_barr, @pahndeepah and I were working on our 'negative metrics' (http://t.co/f8YOOcOLhj), we had @adambriggle in mind. #fracking
@CSC_SharonHays mentions creation of word ('to google') as indicator of #impact (agreed: http://t.co/dgNbyu69rZ) #AAASforum
56 Indicators of Research Impact @CSID_UNT http://t.co/EF9pFCrY6x also http://t.co/XZawIjttid via @NatureMagazine #altmetrics
56 Indicators of Research Impact @CSID_UNT http://t.co/EF9pFCrY6x also http://t.co/XZawIjttid via @NatureMagazine #altmetrics
56 Indicators of Research Impact @CSID_UNT http://t.co/EF9pFCrY6x also http://t.co/XZawIjttid via @NatureMagazine #altmetrics
56 Indicators of Research Impact @CSID_UNT http://t.co/EF9pFCrY6x also http://t.co/XZawIjttid via @Nature #altmetrics
We need negative metrics too. | ReadCube Articles http://t.co/0NE9pphJKY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too @NatureNews http://t.co/kBNg91M9FP
RT @macdab Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/G4EJI7bbG4 @vpresutti citalo
RT @phillbjones: I want to score highly in 'rabble rousing' and 'muckraking' MT @j_sdeering: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/JAHi0Z2Snd
RT @phillbjones: I want to score highly in 'rabble rousing' and 'muckraking' MT @j_sdeering: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/JAHi0Z2Snd
I want to score highly in 'rabble rousing' and 'muckraking' MT @j_sdeering: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/JAHi0Z2Snd
We need negative metrics too. | ReadCube Articles http://t.co/WIL4rsYGWF
@JenHoward RE: your story on #altmetrics: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4. Combining altmetrics w/ a contextualizing narrative is promising approach.
RT @macdab Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/G4EJI7bbG4 @vpresutti citalo
RT @macdab Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/G4EJI7bbG4 @vpresutti citalo
.@jbrittholbrook mentions this paper in Nature "We Need Negative Metrics too" http://t.co/D7symsaL7O #oa13unt
RT @micahvandegrift: .@jbrittholbrook mentions this paper in Nature "We Need Negative Metrics too" http://t.co/KMwd0b3YnH #oa13unt
.@jbrittholbrook mentions this paper in Nature "We Need Negative Metrics too" http://t.co/D7symsaL7O #oa13unt
RT @micahvandegrift: .@jbrittholbrook mentions this paper in Nature "We Need Negative Metrics too" http://t.co/KMwd0b3YnH #oa13unt
.@jbrittholbrook mentions this paper in Nature "We Need Negative Metrics too" http://t.co/D7symsaL7O #oa13unt
Re negative impact metrics >> RT @jbrittholbrook: Also can be read in full, for free, here: http://t.co/hkld0nJdZo #scipolicy
@kieronflanagan Also can be read in full, for free, here: http://t.co/L6L1Wy4fE4.
V interesting from @jbrittholbrook & co. Do we need negative impact metrics, like "lawsuits provoked"? http://t.co/d6SAkhqPr4 (£) #scipolicy
Negative research impact metrics: Imagine my scientific impact if muckraking and rabble rousing were measured. http://t.co/tMfPffq7Ua
Negative research impact metrics: Imagine my scientific impact if muckraking and rabble rousing were measured. http://t.co/tMfPffq7Ua
@kieronflanagan @stianwestlake Thanks for the RTs to my response about the secret Hayek club. Did you see this? http://t.co/PohyR5uie4
Research impact: Do we need negative metrics too? http://t.co/QDKD7ZIrJ5 | Nature
Research impact needs negative metrics, too. http://t.co/9RTWSvw4oF #academia
Research impact: We need negative metrics too : Nature http://t.co/37cEyyLrYq
Research impact needs negative metrics, too. http://t.co/9RTWSvw4oF #academia
Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/gLWiEQRVCb @pixievondust @johnbreslin
RT @macdab Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/G4EJI7bbG4 @vpresutti citalo
RT @macdab Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/G4EJI7bbG4 @vpresutti citalo
Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/gLWiEQRVCb @pixievondust @johnbreslin
Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/gLWiEQRVCb @pixievondust @johnbreslin
Articles may be cited for negative reasons - need for better #research #impact #metrics: http://t.co/gLWiEQRVCb @pixievondust @johnbreslin
@seagertp Did you see this? http://t.co/PohyR5uie4. Would love engineers' perspectives on #impact.
RT @Toffeemen68: Gauging the impact (positive and negative) of your research http://t.co/y1HHJmZNhS
RT @Toffeemen68: Gauging the impact (positive and negative) of your research http://t.co/y1HHJmZNhS
Gauging the impact (positive and negative) of your research http://t.co/y1HHJmZNhS
Compare this table of 33 http://t.co/Nw1uV1bSVk with this of 56 http://t.co/6AVnf9RRWG possible indicators of #research #impact.
Compare this table of 33 http://t.co/Nw1uV1bSVk with this of 56 http://t.co/6AVnf9RRWG possible indicators of #research #impact.
Interesting; table is readable without subscription. True of other Nature articles? MT @jbrittholbrook http://t.co/Jo7KpnJFjk #hargreaves
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/PfSRxuaHej
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/0i2lfywBkN via @GilsonVolpato
@LSEImpactBlog New twist on #impact: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4 preprint: http://t.co/6AVnf9RRWG.
Compare this table of 33 http://t.co/Nw1uV1bSVk with this of 56 http://t.co/6AVnf9RRWG possible indicators of #research #impact.
@LSEImpactBlog New twist on #impact: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4 preprint: http://t.co/6AVnf9RRWG.
@LSEImpactBlog New twist on #impact: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4 preprint: http://t.co/6AVnf9RRWG.
@drdiandra Wonder what you think of this, RE: #broaderimpacts: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
@AAAS_SRHRL @jeffmervis @AAAS_News Assessing research impact: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/0i2lfywBkN via @GilsonVolpato
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Thanks for all RTs of our Nature correspondence: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4 Talked with folks today who plan to use it to discuss #impact! ;-)
James Britt Holbrook, Kelli B., and I publish a letter in Nature this week. Exciting. http://t.co/IDhVznjdF2
@jbrittholbrook, @kelli_barr and I publish a letter in Nature this week. http://t.co/qZz3kzOHDN. #broaderimpact #altmetrics
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/K9RBH1YitP
@heravalue @DrDaveOBrien @elebelfiore @ProfSteveFuller Perhaps #culturalvalue types will find this useful: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
@heravalue @DrDaveOBrien @elebelfiore @ProfSteveFuller Perhaps #culturalvalue types will find this useful: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
@heravalue @DrDaveOBrien @elebelfiore @ProfSteveFuller Perhaps #culturalvalue types will find this useful: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/PfSRxuaHej
@WolfAdviser I know you're busy figuring out #impact. This might help spur some creative thinking: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/kn44JEPOo0
Research metrics are ambiguous — a paper may be cited for positive or negative reasons. Funding agencies and... http://t.co/nQ1ExkNbQo
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/kn44JEPOo0
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/H8RgdXV29l
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/qIy2VtfmkK
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9Ff8YH1MaY
Should "Muckraking" be a metric? @naturemagazine: Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/52oeGYXom0 [paywalled]
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/l4z456Krzg
RT @jbrittholbrook: Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/kn44JEPOo0
Should "Muckraking" be a metric? @naturemagazine: Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/52oeGYXom0 [paywalled]
Great new perspectives from @jbrittholbrook in Nature... RT Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/UqGKAIrWhX
@researchremix @jasonpriem We cite you here: http://t.co/PohyR5uie4.
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/9EEw7JXK7f via @keitabando
Research impact: We need negative metrics too #paywall :( http://t.co/O7OYZUTCLH
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/kn44JEPOo0
@researchremix @ernestopriego @jasonpriem Brainstorming broader impact indicators: http://t.co/3yWSw5Ihz9. I welcome your thoughts!
An imaginative approach, and a quick read - "Research impact: We need negative metrics too" | Nature http://t.co/Tp1oVo2Jeb
Brainstorming #altmetrics: We need negative metrics, too | http://t.co/3yWSw5Ihz9
"paper may be cited for +ve or -ve reasons" - latter is more entertaining | Research impact: We need negative metrics http://t.co/zdGKk2faQK
'We need negative metrics too': interesting letter in @NatureNews from @jbrittholbrook & colleagues http://t.co/RxcxObKYHN
Research impact: We need negative metrics too http://t.co/ZgbIT1sb8N