↓ Skip to main content

Unusual marine unicellular symbiosis with the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium UCYN-A

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Microbiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Unusual marine unicellular symbiosis with the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium UCYN-A
Published in
Nature Microbiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan P. Zehr, Irina N. Shilova, Hanna M. Farnelid, Maria del Carmen Muñoz-Marín, Kendra A. Turk-Kubo

Abstract

Nitrogen fixation - the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) gas to biologically available nitrogen (N) - is an important source of N for terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In terrestrial environments, N2-fixing symbioses involve multicellular plants, but in the marine environment these symbioses occur with unicellular planktonic algae. An unusual symbiosis between an uncultivated unicellular cyanobacterium (UCYN-A) and a haptophyte picoplankton alga was recently discovered in oligotrophic oceans. UCYN-A has a highly reduced genome, and exchanges fixed N for fixed carbon with its host. This symbiosis bears some resemblance to symbioses found in freshwater ecosystems. UCYN-A shares many core genes with the 'spheroid bodies' of Epithemia turgida and the endosymbionts of the amoeba Paulinella chromatophora. UCYN-A is widely distributed, and has diversified into a number of sublineages that could be ecotypes. Many questions remain regarding the physical and genetic mechanisms of the association, but UCYN-A is an intriguing model for contemplating the evolution of N2-fixing organelles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 162 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Environmental Science 24 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 10%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,128,160
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#1,053
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,759
of 425,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#25
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.