Title |
Negative enrichment by immunomagnetic nanobeads for unbiased characterization of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood of cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-9-70 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhian Liu, Alberto Fusi, Eva Klopocki, Alexander Schmittel, Ingeborg Tinhofer, Anika Nonnenmacher, Ulrich Keilholz |
Abstract |
A limitation of positive selection strategies to enrich for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is that there might be CTCs with insufficient expression of the surface target marker which may be missed by the procedure. We optimized a method for enrichment, subsequent detection and characterization of CTCs based on depletion of the leukocyte fraction. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
Researcher | 18 | 13% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 19% |
Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 17% |
Engineering | 21 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 13% |
Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,027,386
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#325
of 3,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,493
of 111,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.