| Title |
Pathways of parallel progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature21104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cyrus M. Ghajar, Mina J. Bissell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 11% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 60% |
| Scientists | 30 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 24% |
| Researcher | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#542,632
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#23,693
of 98,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,045
of 421,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#435
of 885 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 885 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.