RT @SocBotaniqueF: Et si la communication autour des effets positifs du réseau mycorhizien qui relie les arbres par leur racine était exces…
@pitchstonewater In this article, my concerns about the ‘wood wide web’ are incorrectly explained. We concluded that the evidence is thin to none. Our concerns are not based on anthropomorphism. https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @karst_justine: @jenn_bernstein Full disclosure--I've co-authored a critique of the 'wood-wide web' and claims associated with Mother Tr…
@jenn_bernstein Full disclosure--I've co-authored a critique of the 'wood-wide web' and claims associated with Mother Trees https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @tugutuguk: なおカルストさんは「結果の過大解釈により菌根ネットワークに誤った情報がもたらされる」という論文を書かれており、菌根ネットワークを通じた資源移動により苗木の成長が促進されるという主張は、十分にサポートされていないと結論づけておられます。 https:…
RT @tugutuguk: なおカルストさんは「結果の過大解釈により菌根ネットワークに誤った情報がもたらされる」という論文を書かれており、菌根ネットワークを通じた資源移動により苗木の成長が促進されるという主張は、十分にサポートされていないと結論づけておられます。 https:…
@red_dilettante 95% of this shamelessly lifted from this Nature study lmao https://t.co/mEAfFidqHY I think it’s interesting though!
@EwaJozefkowicz @_ZephyrBooks @KateHordern The wood-wide web is a story ahead of the science. Please see recent reviews: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp https://t.co/B1hnvc2GBG https://t.co/EV735lN1XJ
@KlimesovaJitka @Martin_Krizz @CzSam00 Ani samotná komunikace mezi stromy pomocí mykorhizy ale není pořádně prokázaná, ne? Cherrypicking z různorodých výsledků nelehkých experimentů, spousta přehánění a dezinterpretací... spíš jde o "přání otcem myšlenky",
@PamelaBanting @SnowHydro The main issue is there is little to no evidence for Simard's stories about 'mother trees' and how they use belowground fungi to transmit resources/defenses/'information' to their young. Please see: https://t.co/SZ8uRSZugl https:/
@markoftheD The 'wood wide web' is a story ahead of the science. Please see these recent reviews: https://t.co/kWgciqQ0RR https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp https://t.co/B1hnvc2GBG https://t.co/EV735lN1XJ
@knowvity The wood-wide web is a story ahead of the science. See: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp https://t.co/B1hnvc2GBG https://t.co/QvToFfZdxS
@GreenpeaceCA @DrSuzanneSimard The wood-wide web is a story ahead of the science. Please see these reviews: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp https://t.co/B1hnvc2GBG https://t.co/QvToFfZdxS
@DilettanteryPod as fact, when a lot of it is fiction. See our review here: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka Let me know if you have questions or need access to the full paper.
RT @karst_justine: @CobbinSteve1 @philonotis This is a good review of the topic but several more recent reviews have challenged popular cla…
RT @karst_justine: @CobbinSteve1 @philonotis This is a good review of the topic but several more recent reviews have challenged popular cla…
@CobbinSteve1 @philonotis This is a good review of the topic but several more recent reviews have challenged popular claims of the 'wood wide web'. In short, the story is ahead of the science. Please see: https://t.co/QvToFfZdxS https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka ht
RT @FXPicoMercader: Read and understand all the references cited in your papers!!! Applies to juniors and seniors
RT @FXPicoMercader: Read and understand all the references cited in your papers!!! Applies to juniors and seniors
@NOVAeducation please don’t do this. The wood wide web is hyperbole, not properly grounded in science. Please see critique by my colleague @karst_justine and her paper https://t.co/yunzYQbbvU
@NOVAeducation The wood wide web is a story ahead of the science. Please don’t use this video for teaching purposes. Please see challenges to the story: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp https://t.co/Rcti1esihQ
Has @DrSuzanneSimard addressed critiques raised in our and Henriksson’s review about the interpretation of results from her experiments? Maybe I’ve missed this somewhere. Here are our reviews: https://t.co/vUCtfkhQrR https://t.co/ZmCAAn6juC
@ecokonnexion Many of these claims have been challenged. Please see: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6juC
@alexisosvaldo @InformaCosmos https://t.co/qeOBo8H4dO la desinformación es peligrosa pero poner etiquetas a una información por su ideología lo es aún mas
@InformaCosmos Suena muy bucólico, pero no es cierto... https://t.co/jmYYsss0RW
@MikeHudema There is no scientific evidence for this thesis. It remains wishful thinking. See Nature, https://t.co/KoFRAZZBGq
@ForestryEngland This is a story ahead of the science. Please see: https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@prueplum @Shredder_Fella @MayorJD The wood-wide web is a story ahead of the science. Many claims about it in Wohllenben and Simard’s books have been challenged. They haven’t held up to scientific scrutiny. See https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@JouveauM @princertitude https://t.co/qF7s8lDtSf La lecture du résumé semble confirmer que encore une fois la complexité ne rentre pas dans un tweet.
RT @Shou4_Cao3: CMNが流行っている様子(ネガティブな意味で) もっと菌根の世界にも違う文献からの同じような話が載っていた https://t.co/7kH1ovDviR
CMNが流行っている様子(ネガティブな意味で) もっと菌根の世界にも違う文献からの同じような話が載っていた https://t.co/7kH1ovDviR
In early 2023, @karst_justine, Jones and @jhooooks showed that evidence for these claims is lacking. https://t.co/e8Ed58RKvP
@FlinnLab Next was ours @jhooooks & Melanie Jones https://t.co/XotJ54eE2l, followed by Henriksson et al. https://t.co/vUCtfkhQrR (5/x)
RT @karst_justine: @lucy_brownridge Hi there, I came across your new book ‘Little tree and the wood wide web’. Pls know many of claims in t…
@Yantieladyrose The evidence for these claims is not conclusive. Please see https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@lucy_brownridge Hi there, I came across your new book ‘Little tree and the wood wide web’. Pls know many of claims in the book have been challenged. See https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @JeanMichelAne: Very interesting paper from @karst_justine and collaborators. Thanks @MonikaSFischer for highlighting it! - Positive cit…
RT @JeanMichelAne: Very interesting paper from @karst_justine and collaborators. Thanks @MonikaSFischer for highlighting it! - Positive cit…
Very interesting paper from @karst_justine and collaborators. Thanks @MonikaSFischer for highlighting it! - Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests https://t.co/Uogq3yQIgS https://
@haikal_dawson Sure! Our review is a great place to start https://t.co/ZmCAAn6juC and this too https://t.co/EV735lMu8b
How to spread fairytales disguised as science. #PeterWohlleben and his secret life of trees. https://t.co/W3HMYptP7N
論文が読めるリンク。 https://t.co/Fo6gNDf57k
記事中で参照されている論文。 https://t.co/FlSmpufEII
@UNBiodiversity @unredd Fact or myth? Read this article: https://t.co/foQUrRAInG
@rebecca_lexa There are two reviews skeptical of the 'wood-wide web'. I co-authored one of those reviews and a separate group published another. There is a third coming out soon. Pls LMK if you can’t access my article and I can email the pdf. https://t.co/
RT @chomic_pisek: Tak jsem si řekl, že taky zkusím občas upříst nějaké 🧵. Třeba o zajímavých článcích o ekologii lesa. A tady hned jeden re…
Mezitím se můžete mrknout na jedno starší vlákno. Je taky o ektomykorhizních houbách (EMH), takže s tím trošku souvisí. Aspoň si oprášíme, co to ty EMH jsou. https://t.co/reK7tKpGw6
RT @rescodedios: Este artículo se suma al de hace unos meses, mostrando cómo muchos ecólogos habían aceptado de forma acrítica, las hipótes…
Este artículo se suma al de hace unos meses, mostrando cómo muchos ecólogos habían aceptado de forma acrítica, las hipótesis no demostradas sobre la internet del bosque, que han sido refutadas por varios estudios recientes https://t.co/xSsm3KVAvh
@WarriorPoet_72 @nuijten_rob @zeg_eens_aad De mens neigt ertoe zijn kennis en ervaring met het specifieke te veralgemeniseren. Zo wordt ons geheugen ten onrechte als een vorm v informatieopslag gezien en dient internet nu als metafoor voor communicatie tus
@iowablackbird11 @jackcschultz @4everwalkalone @Rainmaker1973 Mycorrhizal networks shared between plants exist but their functional relevance is uncertain and oftentimes exaggerated, misinterpreted, or made up. Pls see https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp , https://t.
Hard to avoid anthropomorphisms but no trees are not sentient (under current definitions anyway) and "mother trees" do not on balance, care for small trees. I can refer you to Justine Karst and colleagues ( @karst_justine @jhooooks ) great review (https:
RT @karst_justine: @Plant_Init @PachamamaOrg @DrSuzanneSimard Pls see recent challenges to claims that mycorrhizal networks in forests medi…
@Plant_Init @PachamamaOrg @DrSuzanneSimard Pls see recent challenges to claims that mycorrhizal networks in forests mediate resource transfer, kin recognition and positive effects on seedlings. https://t.co/QvToFfZdxS , https://t.co/2nSRNbHcAx , https://t.
@stellastafford @SaveStAlbansftf @hertscc @StAlbansCouncil @TreesforStreets @MissingTreesUK @Treesftf @WildlifeTrusts @CPRE @SustainableStA @HighfieldParkTr @PenrhosSave @BonkersBusway There is no conclusive evidence that resources are transferred between
@postition @JudyThomasNor Not that I’m aware of. Here’s a link to our review on the topic https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka and another one https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp and one written for public https://t.co/EV735lN1XJ
@okido_official These claims have been challenged. Pls see https://t.co/EV735lN1XJ , https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@GameHunter1095 @Greenisamissio1 These claims about mycorrhizal networks have recently been challenged. Pls see https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka and https://t.co/QvToFfZdxS
It's hardly due to a lack of evidence, if only because there's not really any evidence that trees talk and share either. The 'wood wide web' is a myth. 3/5 https://t.co/EMCzr1RwxM
@wildsight That trees share nutrients and info through mycorrhizal networks has recently been challenged. Pls see https://t.co/2nSRNbHcAx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@DrewInSeAsia These claims have recently been challenged. Please see https://t.co/2nSRNbGEKZ and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6juC
@RobGMacfarlane @newscientist Hi Robert, After 26 years all published research following up on Simard's original 1997 "wood-wide web" study, you referred to in Underland: A Deep Time Journey, have been re-evaluated and www claims refuted in 2 new papers. D
Positive publication bias. Something to think about. Shows very nicely how certain papers can take on a certain life. Sometimes, small effects are overstated, while negative results are not always reported, leading to publication bias and weak hypotheses..
@Craazylife @matsui27722985 Je suis une scientifique. ☺️https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@specanatura Does this link give you access? https://t.co/KeiP67AHmS
The story of trees using mycorrhyzal fungi to interact (CMN) is well known. In this review there is a concern that claims in the popular media about CMNs in forests are disconnected from evidence and that the field suffers from positive citations bias http
Their recent academic review underpinning their scepticism about the 'wood-wide-web' interpretation of common mycorrhizal networks - and particularly about underground resource-sharing between trees via fungal channels - is sadly not open access. /3x https
@whittledaway @ciaranpiano1 @TalksWild The criticism has nothing to do with forest productivity. I am one of the authors of one of the two key papers that have challenged claims made in both Wohlleben and Simard's work. I am not a forester. Please details
@WaterWired @suzannesimard This is a controversial idea in science because there is little to no evidence for it. Please see https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
He visto algún vídeo New Age que dice que todos los árboles de un bosque están conectados entre sí a través de una red subterránea de micorrizas. No existen pruebas científicas de que los árboles se comuniquen entre sí a través de las redes micorrícicas. h
@Channel4News @krishgm There has been some pushback on claims regarding common mycorrhizal networks in forests. Please see https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@KewScience @DrSuzanneSimard @krishgm There has been some pushback on claims regarding common mycorrhizal networks in forests. Please see https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @karst_justine: @rsen5 @francisbrearley @fmartin1954 @Nature @Rothamsted And it’s not a problem isolated to popular media. It’s also pre…
@mariaKhalusova There has been pushback on some of these claims. Please see https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @karst_justine: @rsen5 @francisbrearley @fmartin1954 @Nature @Rothamsted And it’s not a problem isolated to popular media. It’s also pre…
@einstein_agogo Please see these reviews critiquing Mother Tree Hypothesis https://t.co/vUCtfkiohp and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @karst_justine: @rsen5 @francisbrearley @fmartin1954 @Nature @Rothamsted And it’s not a problem isolated to popular media. It’s also pre…
@rsen5 @francisbrearley @fmartin1954 @Nature @Rothamsted And it’s not a problem isolated to popular media. It’s also present in the scientific literature. We demonstrate this in our review: ‘CMN citations in the literature are biased towards positive effec
@emergence_zine There has been pushback on some of the claims in this article. Please see https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@CBCQuirks Two recent reviews have been published challenging ideas about the 'wood-wide web'. Perhaps worth some coverage on your show? Please see https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka thanks for considering!
@PaulAustinMurp2 Note there has been recent pushback regarding some of Simard’s claims. https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
RT @karst_justine: @speaking_a I am sorry but there is no conclusive evidence to support the 'mother tree' hypothesis. For updates and crit…
RT @karst_justine: @speaking_a I am sorry but there is no conclusive evidence to support the 'mother tree' hypothesis. For updates and crit…
RT @karst_justine: @speaking_a I am sorry but there is no conclusive evidence to support the 'mother tree' hypothesis. For updates and crit…
@5x15stories @kewgardens There has been increasing criticism of the 'wood-wide web'. Please see https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@RogueChieftan Please see updates on the 'wood-wide web'. There is no conclusive evidence for resource transfer between trees/seedlings through these fungal networks. https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@justiceformmiwg Please see recent updates on the 'wood-wide web' https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@speaking_a I am sorry but there is no conclusive evidence to support the 'mother tree' hypothesis. For updates and critiques of these popular claims, please see https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@BossBeechwood Please see updates on this topic https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx and https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@realmahinhasan Please see these two papers for recent updates on this topic https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka and https://t.co/9sOyrw2UWx
RT @NatureEcoEvo: Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests https…
Just found Prof. @karst_justine 's seminar recording about this paper. 😄 https://t.co/ubobXfUklS
and then move to a "deeper" metaphor that focuses on FUNGUS doling out all these resources. A paper actually JUST came out this week that corroborates that. https://t.co/4u92hG1vX2 A paper by @karst_justine and her collaborators argues this too https://t.c
@NZZ @NZZfeuilleton @Wohllebens_WA @NZZWissen good morning @MerlinSheldrake did you comment this? "We conclude that knowledge on CMNs is presently too sparse and unsettled to inform forest management." https://t.co/3q9s4IvjV1 @SpringerNature https://t.co
@arno_kopecky You may be interested in our evaluation of some popular claims about the ‘wood-wide web’ and how many claims don’t survive scrutiny. The story is ahead of the science https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka
@drhelenedwards @midnightmuser1 You may be interested in our recent review highlighting misinformation about the ‘wood-wide web’ https://t.co/ZmCAAn6Rka