| Title |
The sound of a Martian dust devil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-022-35100-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Murdoch, A. E. Stott, M. Gillier, R. Hueso, M. Lemmon, G. Martinez, V. Apéstigue, D. Toledo, R. D. Lorenz, B. Chide, A. Munguira, A. Sánchez-Lavega, A. Vicente-Retortillo, C. E. Newman, S. Maurice, M. de la Torre Juárez, T. Bertrand, D. Banfield, S. Navarro, M. Marin, J. Torres, J. Gomez-Elvira, X. Jacob, A. Cadu, A. Sournac, J. A. Rodriguez-Manfredi, R. C. Wiens, D. Mimoun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 16 | 18% |
| United States | 8 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 78% |
| Scientists | 18 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4012. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,224
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#13
of 58,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41
of 484,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 1,860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.