| Title |
Synaptic pruning through glial synapse engulfment upon motor learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-022-01184-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yosuke M. Morizawa, Mami Matsumoto, Yuka Nakashima, Narumi Endo, Tomomi Aida, Hiroshi Ishikane, Kaoru Beppu, Satoru Moritoh, Hitoshi Inada, Noriko Osumi, Eiji Shigetomi, Schuichi Koizumi, Guang Yang, Hirokazu Hirai, Kohichi Tanaka, Kenji F. Tanaka, Nobuhiko Ohno, Yugo Fukazawa, Ko Matsui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 14% |
| Japan | 20 | 9% |
| France | 9 | 4% |
| Germany | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 68% |
| Scientists | 60 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 35 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#164,642
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#271
of 5,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,709
of 443,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#8
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.