↓ Skip to main content

Common consent

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Common consent
Published in
Nature, August 2009
DOI 10.1038/460933a
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The distribution of human cell lines used in research should not be hindered by restrictions from donors.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2009.
All research outputs
#4,134,721
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#51,325
of 79,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,515
of 161,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#760
of 987 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 987 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.