| Title |
Misrepresentation of the IPCC CO2 emission scenarios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo880 |
| Authors |
M. R. Manning, J. Edmonds, S. Emori, A. Grubler, K. Hibbard, F. Joos, M. Kainuma, R. F. Keeling, T. Kram, A. C. Manning, M. Meinshausen, R. Moss, N. Nakicenovic, K. Riahi, S. K. Rose, S. Smith, R. Swart, D. P. van Vuuren |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 121 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 19% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 51 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2010.
All research outputs
#2,449,389
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,994
of 3,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,207
of 95,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.