↓ Skip to main content

Site- and energy-selective slow-electron production through intermolecular Coulombic decay

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Site- and energy-selective slow-electron production through intermolecular Coulombic decay
Published in
Nature, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirill Gokhberg, Přemysl Kolorenč, Alexander I. Kuleff, Lorenz S. Cederbaum

Abstract

Irradiation of matter with light tends to electronically excite atoms and molecules, with subsequent relaxation processes determining where the photon energy is ultimately deposited and electrons and ions produced. In weakly bound systems, intermolecular Coulombic decay (ICD) enables very efficient relaxation of electronic excitation through transfer of the excess energy to neighbouring atoms or molecules that then lose an electron and become ionized. Here we propose that the emission site and energy of the electrons released during this process can be controlled by coupling the ICD to a resonant core excitation. We illustrate this concept with ab initio many-body calculations on the argon-krypton model system, where resonant photoabsorption produces an initial or 'parent' excitation of the argon atom, which then triggers a resonant-Auger-ICD cascade that ends with the emission of a slow electron from the krypton atom. Our calculations show that the energy of the emitted electrons depends sensitively on the initial excited state of the argon atom. The incident energy can thus be adjusted both to produce the initial excitation in a chosen atom and to realize an excitation that will result in the emission of ICD electrons with desired energies. These properties of the decay cascade might have consequences for fundamental and applied radiation biology and could be of interest in the development of new spectroscopic techniques.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 59 52%
Chemistry 26 23%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,393,541
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#69,905
of 96,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,756
of 320,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#777
of 917 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 917 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.