↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analyses of longevity and senescence reveal variable survival benefits of living in zoos across mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Comparative analyses of longevity and senescence reveal variable survival benefits of living in zoos across mammals
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep36361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgane Tidière, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Vérane Berger, Dennis W. H. Müller, Laurie Bingaman Lackey, Olivier Gimenez, Marcus Clauss, Jean-François Lemaître

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 220 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Master 32 14%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Environmental Science 18 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 58 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#193,483
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,341
of 142,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,754
of 319,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#56
of 3,667 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,667 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.