| Title |
The developing bird pelvis passes through ancestral dinosaurian conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-022-04982-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher T. Griffin, João F. Botelho, Michael Hanson, Matteo Fabbri, Daniel Smith-Paredes, Ryan M. Carney, Mark A. Norell, Shiro Egawa, Stephen M. Gatesy, Timothy B. Rowe, Ruth M. Elsey, Sterling J. Nesbitt, Bhart-Anjan S. Bhullar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 499 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 59 | 12% |
| Japan | 30 | 6% |
| Brazil | 26 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 5% |
| Spain | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| Mexico | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 50 | 10% |
| Unknown | 261 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 368 | 74% |
| Scientists | 118 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 462. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#60,191
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,754
of 98,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,910
of 434,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#117
of 1,042 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,042 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.