| Title |
The developing bird pelvis passes through ancestral dinosaurian conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-022-04982-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher T. Griffin, João F. Botelho, Michael Hanson, Matteo Fabbri, Daniel Smith-Paredes, Ryan M. Carney, Mark A. Norell, Shiro Egawa, Stephen M. Gatesy, Timothy B. Rowe, Ruth M. Elsey, Sterling J. Nesbitt, Bhart-Anjan S. Bhullar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 510 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 12% |
| Japan | 34 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 5% |
| Brazil | 27 | 5% |
| Spain | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| France | 7 | 1% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 51 | 10% |
| Unknown | 257 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 377 | 74% |
| Scientists | 119 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#54,724
of 24,909,203 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,429
of 96,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,777
of 424,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#114
of 1,041 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,909,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,041 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.