↓ Skip to main content

Integration and segregation of large-scale brain networks during short-term task automatization

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Integration and segregation of large-scale brain networks during short-term task automatization
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms13217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holger Mohr, Uta Wolfensteller, Richard F. Betzel, Bratislav Mišić, Olaf Sporns, Jonas Richiardi, Hannes Ruge

Abstract

The human brain is organized into large-scale functional networks that can flexibly reconfigure their connectivity patterns, supporting both rapid adaptive control and long-term learning processes. However, it has remained unclear how short-term network dynamics support the rapid transformation of instructions into fluent behaviour. Comparing fMRI data of a learning sample (N=70) with a control sample (N=67), we find that increasingly efficient task processing during short-term practice is associated with a reorganization of large-scale network interactions. Practice-related efficiency gains are facilitated by enhanced coupling between the cingulo-opercular network and the dorsal attention network. Simultaneously, short-term task automatization is accompanied by decreasing activation of the fronto-parietal network, indicating a release of high-level cognitive control, and a segregation of the default mode network from task-related networks. These findings suggest that short-term task automatization is enabled by the brain's ability to rapidly reconfigure its large-scale network organization involving complementary integration and segregation processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 28%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 61 26%
Psychology 49 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Computer Science 10 4%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#590,073
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,170
of 56,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,268
of 318,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#217
of 931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.