RT @ldodds: Licence restrictions: A fool's errand https://t.co/CmPgqXxueh
RT @ldodds: Licence restrictions: A fool's errand https://t.co/CmPgqXxueh
Licence Restrictions: A Fool's Errand https://t.co/LjCoCFR65f
RT @erodley: #OpenGLAM folks, this is worth a read: https://t.co/bRaD9XqsMH https://t.co/B1766eF4eE
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand https://t.co/CmPgqXxueh
RT @ryanmerkley: "If we allow only a tiny set of predicted reuses, those are, by definition, the only reuses we will get — and they will be…
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
RT @Protohedgehog: "The debate over CC-BY is actually an attempt to reinterpret what the 'open' in 'open access' means. There are parties w…
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" is a powerful defense of the open CC BY license versus untested closed alternatives for scholarly publishing. https://t.co/IXQpQ4aoVN PS @wilbanks did you transfer © to @nature? It's a bit odd that this comment is n
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand https://t.co/66ZGToQfvc
RT @g_fra: "Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" By @wilbanks https://t.co/BDHGV8cIjT
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
RT @Protohedgehog: "The debate over CC-BY is actually an attempt to reinterpret what the 'open' in 'open access' means. There are parties w…
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
RT @Protohedgehog: "The debate over CC-BY is actually an attempt to reinterpret what the 'open' in 'open access' means. There are parties w…
RT @g_fra: "Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" By @wilbanks https://t.co/BDHGV8cIjT
RT @Protohedgehog: "The debate over CC-BY is actually an attempt to reinterpret what the 'open' in 'open access' means. There are parties w…
RT @g_fra: "Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" By @wilbanks https://t.co/BDHGV8cIjT
RT @g_fra: "Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" By @wilbanks https://t.co/BDHGV8cIjT
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" By @wilbanks https://t.co/BDHGV8cIjT
RT @Protohedgehog: "The debate over CC-BY is actually an attempt to reinterpret what the 'open' in 'open access' means. There are parties w…
RT @mfressoli: Buen artículo sobre el papel de las licencias en la discusión sobre acceso abierto @cientopolis @fund_cenit https://t.co/y8Q…
"The debate over CC-BY is actually an attempt to reinterpret what the 'open' in 'open access' means. There are parties who want open access to be as closed as possible to protect their business models from change." Powerful from @wilbanks https://t.co/Q3N3
Empiezan a circular nuevas propuestas de licencias supuestamente Open Access menos restrictivas que las Creative Commons. Rotundamente falso, y en una era en que la mayoría de los artículos son «leídos» y «datificados» por máquinas, conviene saber porqué h
Perhaps worth reading alongside more recent statements from, for instance, researchers working in the global South (https://t.co/xIufhgvChF) and a woman who writes online about technology (https://t.co/jOuEa40pry). https://t.co/HGlrwjvUUn
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
RT @creativecommons: Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says…
Objections to the CC BY license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible says @wilbanks in @nature https://t.co/vVwoHR7KMm
#OpenGLAM folks, this is worth a read: https://t.co/bRaD9XqsMH https://t.co/B1766eF4eE
RT @ryanmerkley: "If we allow only a tiny set of predicted reuses, those are, by definition, the only reuses we will get — and they will be…
RT @ryanmerkley: "If we allow only a tiny set of predicted reuses, those are, by definition, the only reuses we will get — and they will be…
RT @ryanmerkley: "If we allow only a tiny set of predicted reuses, those are, by definition, the only reuses we will get — and they will be…
"If we allow only a tiny set of predicted reuses, those are, by definition, the only reuses we will get — and they will benefit only the existing power players in scholarly publishing." @wilbanks skillfully refutes arguments for new licenses for OA. https:
RT @cgreen: A must read article about @creativecommons CC BY licenses on #OA articles by: @wilbanks https://t.co/8Vms63RWfP
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" A must read from 2013 by @wilbanks https://t.co/tT7nqqq0kq #copyright #openaccess
RT @cgreen: A must read article about @creativecommons CC BY licenses on #OA articles by: @wilbanks https://t.co/8Vms63RWfP
RT @Villavelius: “In my view, for an article to be considered truely open access, it has to meet the widely accepted definition in the Buda…
TL-DR? Just use creative commons for all articles and papers. "License restrictions - A fool's errand" https://t.co/PDqiH5qb3U
RT @cgreen: A must read article about @creativecommons CC BY licenses on #OA articles by: @wilbanks https://t.co/8Vms63RWfP
A must read article about @creativecommons CC BY licenses on #OA articles by: @wilbanks https://t.co/8Vms63RWfP
RT @bc_butler: HUZZAH. I always push hard against NC, ND, and SA. Heck, I prefer CC-0. Complexity is the enemy of sharing, and are you *rea…
RT @bc_butler: HUZZAH. I always push hard against NC, ND, and SA. Heck, I prefer CC-0. Complexity is the enemy of sharing, and are you *rea…
HUZZAH. I always push hard against NC, ND, and SA. Heck, I prefer CC-0. Complexity is the enemy of sharing, and are you *really* prepared to *sue* someone who reuses your work the wrong way? https://t.co/V3KztdZIx8
RT @SarahEHare: CC @lilyrglg & @aliversluis could be a reading for our #FSCI course and precursor to debate "are OER shared under CC BY ND…
.@wilbanks makes strong counter points to the arguments for more restrictive CC licenses for scholarly works. Worth a read for those at #LPforum18: https://t.co/3caCnwbfYK
Now discussing CC BY vs more restrictive licenses @ #ASAPbio Town Hall. Time to plug this @wilbanks classic again: https://t.co/qZgBsmnsoL
RT @nshockey: @ashleydfarley @Science_Open @open_con Always happy to recommend this classic by @wilbanks https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj
RT @nshockey: @ashleydfarley @Science_Open @open_con Always happy to recommend this classic by @wilbanks https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj
RT @nshockey: @ashleydfarley @Science_Open @open_con Always happy to recommend this classic by @wilbanks https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj
RT @nshockey: @ashleydfarley @Science_Open @open_con Always happy to recommend this classic by @wilbanks https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj
RT @nshockey: @ashleydfarley @Science_Open @open_con Always happy to recommend this classic by @wilbanks https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj
@ashleydfarley @Science_Open @open_con Always happy to recommend this classic by @wilbanks https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj
.@marklclemente @wilbanks to the rescue "Licensing Restrictions: A Fool's Errand" (ironically in Nature) https://t.co/qZgBsmF3gj #SPARC2016
@bella_velo @McDawg @MLBrook CC-BY = only license that fulfills BOAI. See @OASPA http://t.co/q0ZG6SYTtL & @wilbanks http://t.co/wUpladAWR7
.@DeGruyterOpen @SDawsonBerlin @marknpatterson See also @wilbanks in Nature on restrictive licenses: http://t.co/wVSEFeQlvZ #opencon2014
.@DeGruyterOpen @SDawsonBerlin @marknpatterson See also @wilbanks in Nature on restrictive licenses: http://t.co/wVSEFeQlvZ #opencon2014
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" Fab article by @wilbanks abt @creativecommons & #openaccess http://t.co/p8WsRWYBlB
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" Fab article by @wilbanks abt @creativecommons & #openaccess http://t.co/p8WsRWYBlB
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" Fab article by @wilbanks abt @creativecommons & #openaccess http://t.co/p8WsRWYBlB
"Licence restrictions: A fool's errand" Fab article by @wilbanks abt @creativecommons & #openaccess http://t.co/p8WsRWYBlB
“@mdeimann: Die Probleme mit CC-Lizenzen im internationalen Diskurs (nature 495) http://t.co/DLe0eVupB4 #OERde13” #OERkoeln13
Problem of what happens when you let evangelists preach - http://t.co/5y1pt3bbpP #whyopen
@copyrightgirl http://t.co/5y1pt3bbpP - no copyright in "facts" - surely how "fact" is expressed?
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand http://t.co/iXzZFXys70 ¿Qué licencias son coherentes con un completo #accesoabierto? #openaccess
"Anyone who pays [...] under CC-BY is either making a donation or paying a tax for being inept at searching" http://t.co/PKmcYw5F4h @nadjao
"Anyone who pays for an object under CC-BY is either making a donation or paying a tax for being inept at searching" http://t.co/Sv5bHPVimN
"Anyone who pays for an object under CC-BY is either making a donation or paying a tax for being inept at searching" http://t.co/Sv5bHPVimN
RT @DataG: Licence restrictions: A fool's errand [so-called "CC Plus" | John Wilbanks in Nature http://t.co/aJ1a35n16h
RT @DataG: Licence restrictions: A fool's errand [so-called "CC Plus"] | John Wilbanks in Nature http://t.co/IvRUAJXIqH
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand [so-called "CC Plus" | John Wilbanks in Nature http://t.co/aJ1a35n16h
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand [so-called "CC Plus" | John Wilbanks in Nature http://t.co/aJ1a35n16h
"Licences that distinguish between kinds of reuse... fail every definition of open access." @wilbanks http://t.co/JC7R7WR0z5 @NatureMagazine
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand : Nature http://t.co/BWpi7vdrZY
Licence restrictions: A fool's errand http://t.co/oTB6xEJHX8
"Licences that distinguish between kinds of reuse... fail every definition of open access." @wilbanks http://t.co/JC7R7WR0z5 @NatureMagazine
"Licences that distinguish between kinds of reuse... fail every definition of open access." @wilbanks http://t.co/JC7R7WR0z5 @NatureMagazine
"Licences that distinguish between kinds of reuse... fail every definition of open access." @wilbanks http://t.co/JC7R7WR0z5 @NatureMagazine
#Librarians #LibChat New to #CC-By license but this is very interesting: Licence restrictions: A fool's errand http://t.co/5cBVR6AWTk