↓ Skip to main content

Vibrissa motor cortex activity suppresses contralateral whisking behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Vibrissa motor cortex activity suppresses contralateral whisking behavior
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nn.4437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Laut Ebbesen, Guy Doron, Constanze Lenschow, Michael Brecht

Abstract

Anatomical, stimulation and lesion data implicate vibrissa motor cortex in whisker motor control. Work on motor cortex has focused on movement generation, but correlations between vibrissa motor cortex activity and whisking are weak. The exact role of vibrissa motor cortex remains unknown. We recorded vibrissa motor cortex neurons during various forms of vibrissal touch, which were invariably associated with whisker protraction and movement. Free whisking, object palpation and social touch all resulted in decreased cortical activity. To understand this activity decrease, we performed juxtacellular recordings, nanostimulation and in vivo whole-cell recordings. Social touch resulted in decreased spiking activity, decreased cell excitability and membrane hyperpolarization. Activation of vibrissa motor cortex by intracortical microstimulation elicited whisker retraction, as if to abort vibrissal touch. Various vibrissa motor cortex inactivation protocols resulted in contralateral protraction and increased whisker movements. These data collectively point to movement suppression as a prime function of vibrissa motor cortex activity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 214 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 30%
Researcher 59 26%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 20 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 85 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Engineering 13 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 23 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#814,930
of 19,249,286 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,408
of 4,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,815
of 305,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#37
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,249,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.