↓ Skip to main content

In retrospect: On the Mode of Communication of Cholera

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
316 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
In retrospect: On the Mode of Communication of Cholera
Published in
Nature, March 2013
DOI 10.1038/495169a
Authors

William Bynum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 316 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#194,184
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,651
of 98,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,177
of 209,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#120
of 995 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 995 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.