| Title |
Rewriting a genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/495050a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuelle Charpentier, Jennifer A. Doudna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Aruba | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 391 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 16% |
| Researcher | 60 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 134 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Unknown | 80 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#593,599
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#24,704
of 96,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,870
of 200,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#360
of 985 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 985 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.