↓ Skip to main content

Planar gradient metamaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Materials, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Planar gradient metamaterials
Published in
Nature Reviews Materials, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.67
Authors

Yadong Xu, Yangyang Fu, Huanyang Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 29%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 30%
Physics and Astronomy 26 22%
Materials Science 9 8%
Chemistry 3 3%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,387,502
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Materials
#631
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,649
of 319,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Materials
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.