↓ Skip to main content

Realization of quantum error correction

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Realization of quantum error correction
Published in
Nature, December 2004
DOI 10.1038/nature03074
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Chiaverini, D. Leibfried, T. Schaetz, M. D. Barrett, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, D. J. Wineland

Abstract

Scalable quantum computation and communication require error control to protect quantum information against unavoidable noise. Quantum error correction protects information stored in two-level quantum systems (qubits) by rectifying errors with operations conditioned on the measurement outcomes. Error-correction protocols have been implemented in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments, but the inherent limitations of this technique prevent its application to quantum information processing. Here we experimentally demonstrate quantum error correction using three beryllium atomic-ion qubits confined to a linear, multi-zone trap. An encoded one-qubit state is protected against spin-flip errors by means of a three-qubit quantum error-correcting code. A primary ion qubit is prepared in an initial state, which is then encoded into an entangled state of three physical qubits (the primary and two ancilla qubits). Errors are induced simultaneously in all qubits at various rates. The encoded state is decoded back to the primary ion one-qubit state, making error information available on the ancilla ions, which are separated from the primary ion and measured. Finally, the primary qubit state is corrected on the basis of the ancillae measurement outcome. We verify error correction by comparing the corrected final state to the uncorrected state and to the initial state. In principle, the approach enables a quantum state to be maintained by means of repeated error correction, an important step towards scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation using trapped ions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 304 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 31%
Researcher 69 21%
Student > Master 27 8%
Professor 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 47 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 233 71%
Engineering 17 5%
Computer Science 7 2%
Chemistry 5 2%
Mathematics 3 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 52 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,651,673
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,491
of 92,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,850
of 142,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#79
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.