↓ Skip to main content

An update of “Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in the Netherlands: the results of a Consensus Rotavirus Vaccine model”

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
An update of “Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in the Netherlands: the results of a Consensus Rotavirus Vaccine model”
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Anh T Tu, Mark H Rozenbaum, Pieter T de Boer, Albert C Noort, Maarten J Postma

Abstract

To update a cost-effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in the Netherlands previously published in 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 45%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,743,944
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,047
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,687
of 282,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#97
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.