| Title |
Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case–control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/bjc.2016.290 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Landy, Francesca Pesola, Alejandra Castañón, Peter Sasieni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 59% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 25% |
| Scientists | 13 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 428 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
| Researcher | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 147 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 161 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#110,756
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#39
of 11,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,272
of 334,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#2
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.