| Title |
Discovery of species-wide tool use in the Hawaiian crow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Rutz, Barbara C. Klump, Lisa Komarczyk, Rosanna Leighton, Joshua Kramer, Saskia Wischnewski, Shoko Sugasawa, Michael B. Morrissey, Richard James, James J. H. St Clair, Richard A. Switzer, Bryce M. Masuda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 683 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 70 | 10% |
| United States | 65 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 6% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| India | 11 | 2% |
| Spain | 10 | 1% |
| Germany | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 9 | 1% |
| France | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 63 | 9% |
| Unknown | 389 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 579 | 85% |
| Scientists | 81 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 19% |
| Researcher | 52 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 124 | 44% |
| Psychology | 19 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 68 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1773. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,872
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#623
of 98,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 331,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#9
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.