Title |
Vaccine renaissance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Microbiology, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1038/nrmicro1702 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeffrey W. Almond |
Abstract |
Vaccines are one of the most useful and cost-effective tools for reducing the morbidity and mortality that are associated with infectious diseases. Here, Jeffrey Almond discusses the selection of articles in this Focus issue, in the context of the challenges and opportunities facing vaccine developers today. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 12% |
Professor | 6 | 10% |
Other | 16 | 27% |
Unknown | 3 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 41% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,179,139
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1,880
of 2,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,009
of 68,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.